Skip to main content

Table 3 Attitudes of Ohio-based producers (n = 57) that participated in a self-administered and anonymous electronic survey regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases

From: Describing the experience of livestock producers from Ohio, USA with ticks and associated diseases

Question

n (%)

Do you think that ticks pose a risk to your health or the health of your employees/coworkers?

 Yes, major health risks (debilitating or life-threatening)

28 (49.1%)

 Yes, minor health risks (short-term or not life-threatening)

27 (47.4%)

 No answer

2 (3.5%)

Do you think that ticks pose a risk to the health of the animals that you work with?

 Yes, major health risks (life-threatening or serious loss of production)

31 (54.4%)

 Yes, minor health risks (short term illness or minor loss of production)

20 (35.1%)

 No

4 (7.0%)

 No answer

2 (3.5%)

Considering the past 5 years, have you noticed a change in the number of ticks that you encounter?

 Yes, I used to see more ticks than I do now

14 (24.6%)

 Yes, I used to see fewer ticks than I do now

26 (45.6%)

 No, the number of ticks I see hasn’t changed

8 (14.0%)

 Not sure

6 (10.5%)

 No answer

3 (5.3%)

How common do you think tick-borne disease is in humans in Ohio?

 Rare

8 (14.0%)

 Occurs occasionally

32 (56.1%)

 Very common

13 (22.9%)

 No answer

4 (7.0%)

How common do you think tick-borne disease is in livestock in Ohio?

 Rare

6 (10.5%)

 Occurs occasionally

28 (49.1%)

 Very common

18 (31.6%)

 No answer

5 (8.8%)

Do you think that your work on the farm puts you at higher risk for tick-borne disease than the average person in Ohio?

 Yes

46 (80.7%)

 No

7 (12.3%)

 No answer

4 (7.0%)