Skip to main content

Table 4 Brucellosis cases reported through AfyaData app in treatment community from May to September 2020 with their socio demographic information

From: Effect of awareness training to frontline health workers and the use of e-based technology on reporting of brucellosis cases in selected pastoral communities, Tanzania: a quasi-experimental study

Variable

N = 141

Frequency

(n%)

Seropositive (RBT),

P-value

Seropositive

(c-ELISA),

n (%)

P-value

n (%)

Sex

Male

48 (34.0)

7 (41.2)

0.588

1 (25.0)

1.000

 

Female

93 (66.0)

10 (58.8)

 

3 (75.0)

 

Age

1–10

15 (10.6)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

11–20

23 (16.3)

4 (23.5)

0.543

1 (25.0)

0.711

 

21–30

32 (22.7)

5 (29.4)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

31–40

34 (24.1)

4 (23.5)

 

2 (50.0)

 
 

> 40

37 (26.2)

4 (23.5)

 

1 (25.0)

 

Number of cases in health facility

  
 

Kimamba

28 (19.9)

2 (11.8)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Rudewa

6 (4.3)

5 (29.4)

0.0003

0 (0.0)

0.336

 

Msowero

19 (13.5)

1 (5.9)

 

2 (50.0)

 
 

Tindiga

2 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Dakawa

9 (6.4)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Dumila Dispensary

26 (18.4)

1 (5.9)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Dumila HC

7 (5.0)

1 (5.9)

 

1 (25.0)

 
 

Dodoma Isanga

1 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Changarawe

1 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Twatwatwa

4 (2.8)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Serengeti kada

2 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Agape

11 (7.8)

5 (29.4)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

Chanzuru

10 (7.1)

0 (0.0)

 

0 (0.0)

 
 

China Estate

15 (10.6)

2 (11.8)

 

1 (25.0)

 
  1. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) P-value is highlighted in bold