Skip to main content

Table 5 WHO benchmarks tool (2019) actions fully or partiallya supported by MTaPS as of September 2022b

From: Moving from assessments to implementation: promising practices for strengthening multisectoral antimicrobial resistance containment capacity

Joint External Evaluation (JEE) capacity levelc

Countryd

Bangladesh

Burkina Faso

Cameroon

Côte d'Ivoire

DRC

Ethiopia

Kenya

Mali

Mozambique

Nigeria

Senegal

Tanzania (mainland)

Uganda

P.3.1 Effective multisectoral coordination on AMRe

 JEE Capacity Baseline Score

No baseline scores, as the first version of the JEE tool (2016) used for these evaluations did not have indicator on effective multisectoral coordination on AMR

 Limited Capacity—02 (4 actions)

0%

50%

50%

100%

50%

100%

50%

0%

50%

0%

50%

0%

50%

 Developed Capacity—03 (4 actions)

25%

50%

50%

75%

50%

100%

50%

75%

50%

50%

50%

50%

50%

 Demonstrated Capacity – 04 (4 actions)

75%

50%

25%

75%

75%

100%

100%

100%

25%

75%

50%

75%

50%

 Sustainable Capacity—05 (5 actions)

20%

0%

0%

0%

20%

0%

40%

20%

0%

20%

20%

0%

0%

P.3.3 Infection prevention and control

 JEE Capacity Baseline Scoreg (Month and year of JEE)

2 (May 2016)

1 (Dec 2017)

1 (Sep 2017)

1 (Dec 2016)

1 (Mar 2018)

2 (Mar 2016)

3 Feb-Mar 2017)

2 (Jun 2017)

3 (Apr 2016)

2 (Jun 2017)

3 (Nov-Dec 2016)

3 (Feb 2016)

3 (Jun 2017)

 Limited Capacity—02 (5 actions)

80%

N/Af

80%

100%

80%

80%

80%

100%

80%

60%

60%

80%

100%

 Developed Capacity—03 (6 actions)

83%

N/A

83%

100%

67%

100%

67%

83%

67%

67%

100%

100%

100%

 Demonstrated Capacity – 04 (5 actions)

20%

N/A

60%

80%

0%

80%

60%

40%

0%

0%

60%

100%

40%

 Sustainable Capacity—05 (5 actions)

0%

N/A

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

40%

100%

0%

P.3.4 Optimize use of antimicrobial medicines in human and animal health and agriculture

 JEE Capacity Baseline Scoreg

2

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

2

1

1

3

 Limited Capacity—02 (4 actions)

50%

50%

50%

75%

75%

75%

75%

75%

50%

100%

75%

100%

50%

 Developed Capacity—03 (6 actions)

33%

17%

33%

83%

33%

67%

83%

50%

50%

50%

33%

50%

33%

 Demonstrated Capacity – 04 (7 actions)

0%

0%

29%

29%

0%

14%

14%

14%

14%

0%

0%

14%

29%

 Sustainable Capacity—05 (7 actions)

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Total number of MTaPS-supported actions (%)

19/62 (31%)

9/41 (22%)f

23/62 (37%)

33/62 (53%)

21/62 (34%)

34/62 (55%)

30/62 (48%)

27/62 (44%)

19/62 (31%)

20/62 (32%)

26/62 (42%)

33/62 (53%)

25/62 (40%)

  1. aSome benchmark actions were partially achieved as they comprise two or more separate components, some of which MTaPS did not support
  2. bThis table reflects only those WHO benchmark actions that MTaPS supported, so is not a comprehensive picture of the country’s AMR containment capacity. Support for some benchmark actions was ongoing as of September 2022
  3. cThere are no benchmark actions associated with level 01 (no capacity)
  4. dMTaPS initiated GHSA support in October 2020 in Mozambique and Nigeria, December 2019 in Bangladesh, and between September 2018 and March 2019 in the remaining countries. MTaPS did not have activities in Ethiopia from December 2020 to September 2021
  5. eThe JEE baseline was conducted using the first (2016) edition of the tool, which unlike the second (2018) edition, did not include indicator for ‘effective multisectoral coordination on AMR’
  6. fMTaPS does not support IPC activities in Burkina Faso
  7. gSome of the actions that MTaPS supported corresponded to the actions recommended for the same level as the JEE baseline score levels or even below the baseline levels, because we found that they had not been addressed yet