Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis to understand the association between socio-economic factors and participants’ beliefs about the risk of zoonotic disease transmission

From: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with zoonotic disease transmission risk in North Sulawesi, Indonesia

Gender

Knows of Risks Associated with Open Wound(n = 477)aAdj-R2 = 0.293

Worried About Disease in Animals at Market(n = 477)aAdj-R2 = 0.078

OR

95% CI

p value

OR

95% CI

p value

 Female

Ref

     

 Male

0.86

0.47–1.57

0.625

0.24

0.09–0.56

0.001

Age

 Under 24

Ref

     

 25 to 54

0.99

0.38–2.48

0.99

1.64

0.46–5.09

0.42

 over 55

0.88

0.32–2.38

0.80

2.02

0.51–7.24

0.29

Highest education

 None + primary school

Ref

     

 Secondary school + College/university

1.14

0.64–2.01

0.66

1.65

0.78–3.46

0.18

Study sites

 Village A

Ref

     

 Village B

34.47

13.51–107.84

< 0.001

9.47

2.95–42.61

< 0.001

 Village C

30.47

12.31–88.71

< 0.001

8.58

2.59–39.66

0.001

 Village D

2.01

1.11–3.69

0.02

0.93

0.41–2.10

0.86

Primary livelihood

 Crop production

Ref

     

 Domestic animal related business

4.17

0.59–84.79

0.21

0.57

0.08–11.86

0.63

 Homemaker

0.31

0.15–0.64

0.002

0.19

0.05–0.55

0.003

 Non-animal related business

1.09

0.55–2.16

0.81

0.35

0.13–0.89

0.02

 Unemployed/student/child

0.54

0.18–1.66

0.27

0.68

0.16–3.59

0.62

 Wildlife related business

0.69

0.21–2.11

0.52

0.49

0.13–2.09

0.31

Crowding index

0.93

0.58–1.51

0.78

1.32

0.71–2.56

0.39

Dedicated location for waste

 No

Ref

     

 Yes

1.93

0.94–4.07

0.07

1.32

0.49–3.23

0.56

  1. aMissing values, if any, were omitted before the regression analysis process