Skip to main content

Table 2 Mixed effects logistic regression of the relationship between household food security and male and female resource control, with control variables

From: Female and male-controlled livestock holdings impact pastoralist food security and women’s dietary diversity

 

Odds Ratio

95% Confidence Interval

Tropical livestock units (10s)

1.03

[0.99, 1.09]

Number of wives in household

0.67

[0.44, 0.99]

Educated head of household

1.31

[0.59, 3.02]

  1. Notes: Tribe-specific relationships between chickens and food security are presented in Fig. 2. Independent variables included in the regression were: Tropical livestock units, Number of wives in the household, Educated head of household (vs. head of household without formal education), Number of chickens owned by the household, Agro-pastoralist (vs. pastoralist) household, and the interaction between Number of chickens and Agro-pastoralist household
  2. N=177; 19 households were dropped due to having data missing for at least one variable included in the regression